Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Common law will be applied, not the UCC, because the contract was mixed.
B) The UCC will be applied, not common law, because the contract was mixed.
C) The court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
D) The court will apply the service-warranty test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the provision of a service in which case the UCC would apply.
E) The court will apply the service-warranty test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A sale of goods
B) A lease
C) A transfer
D) A rental
E) A consignment
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) 1980
B) 1964
C) 1952
D) 1943
E) 1935
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because the UCC is a federal law, states have no rights to change it.
B) Each state is allowed to rewrite parts of the UCC to reflect the wishes of its state legislature.
C) States must adopt the UCC in full or not at all.
D) State legislatures may make changes to Article 2 of the UCC but not to any other articles.
E) State legislatures may make changes to Article 2(A) of the UCC but not to any other articles.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Israel is a signatory of the CISG.
B) The United States applies the UCC but not the CISG.
C) The United Kingdom is not a signatory of the CISG and instead applies English common law.
D) The CISG is a treaty.
E) Mexico has signed the CISG.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 2
B) 2(A)
C) 4
D) 4(A)
E) 6
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Based upon the facts given, Fran cannot recover because the father, who was not a merchant in regards to the transaction and had not signed anything showing that he was to be charged for the shirts.
B) Fran can recover because she sent the father a confirming letter, and he did not object within 10 days of receipt.
C) Fran can recover because she sent the father a confirming letter, and he did not object within 20 days of receipt.
D) Fran can recover because the transaction was not covered by the UCC.
E) Fran can recover only if she can prove by testimony of a witness that the father received the confirming letter and read it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Wallace is correct. Fran cannot recover because she has nothing in writing.
B) Wallace is incorrect because the cost of the caps is insufficient to come within the requirement of a writing under the UCC.
C) Wallace is incorrect because Fran has witnesses.
D) Wallace is incorrect because Fran had already made the caps.
E) Wallace is incorrect both because Fran had already made the caps and also because she had witnesses.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 2
B) 2(A)
C) 4
D) 4(A)
E) 6
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Minerals taken from real estate and sold by the owner, soil taken from real estate and sold by the owner, and the right to remove soil from real estate are all considered goods under the UCC.
B) Soil taken from real estate and sold by the owner is considered a good under the UCC, but neither minerals taken from real estate and sold by the owner nor the right to remove soil from real estate are considered goods under the UCC.
C) The right to remove soil from real estate is considered a good under the UCC, but neither minerals taken from real estate and sold by the owner nor soil taken from real estate and sold by the owner are considered goods under the UCC.
D) Minerals taken from real estate and sold by the owner and soil taken from real estate and sold by the owner are considered goods under the UCC, but the right to remove soil from real estate is not considered a good under the UCC.
E) Minerals taken from real estate and sold by the owner and the right to remove soil from real estate are considered goods under the UCC, but soil taken from real estate and sold by the owner is not considered a good under the UCC.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) (1) Express terms, (2) Course of performance, (3) Course of dealing, and (4) Usage of trade
B) (1) Usage of trade, (2) Course of performance, (3) Course of dealing, and (4) Express terms
C) (1) Express terms, (2) Course of dealing, (3) Course of performance, and (4) Usage of trade
D) (1) Course of performance, (2) Course of dealing, (3) Express terms, and (4) Usage of trade
E) (1) Express terms, (2) Usage of trade, (3) Course of dealing, and (4) Course of performance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That it is well recognized under the UCC that quotes are considered offers.
B) That it is well recognized under the UCC that quotes are not considered offers.
C) That the UCC does not apply at all to disputes involving quotes because quotes are not goods.
D) That generally quotes are not offers but that some price quotes are sufficiently detailed to be deemed offers.
E) That generally quotes are offers but that some price quotes are sufficiently vague to be deemed mere invitations to enter into negotiations or to submit offers.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Merchandise
B) Real
C) Tangible
D) Movable
E) Saleable
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Consumer and finance but not terminal
B) Finance but not consumer or terminal
C) Terminal and finance but not consumer
D) Terminal but not finance or consumer
E) Consumer but not finance or terminal
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 65
Related Exams